The Economist: verschil tussen versies

Uit wakkerpedia
Ga naar: navigatie, zoeken
 
(7 tussenliggende versies door 3 gebruikers niet weergegeven)
Regel 1: Regel 1:
[[Links]]e, Engelstalige, [[Linkse graaier]], door de [[PvdA]] geinfecteerde krant. Vind [[Geert]] maar een valse profeet en een racist. Ook wordt onze blonde leider er met de (neo-)[[Nazi]]s vergeleken. Wij, [[Henk]] en [[Ingrid]] vinden dit natuurlijk niet goed.
+
[[Links]]e [[Engels]]talige, door de [[PvdA]] geïnfecteerde [[krant]]je dat niemand leest. Noemt onze [[Geert]] een valse profeet en een [[racist]]. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)[[nazi]] [[demoniseren|vergeleken]]. Walgelijk!
  
----
 
The Economist pearls;
 
  
''"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."
+
[[categorie:kranten]]
 +
[[categorie:linkse kranten]]
  
Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.'' <br />
 
'''GeertAkbar wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:17 GMT'''
 
  
''So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?
+
----
  
Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  
IT IS BADLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.
+
''So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?''<br />
 
+
''Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!''<br />
Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it.
+
''IT IS BALDLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.''<br />
 
+
''Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it. The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and
The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>'' <br />
+
I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>''<br />
 
'''DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT'''
 
'''DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT'''
  
''This side is top!'' <br />
+
''More and more Dutch are fed up with the looney left and its political-correct censorist police. It was for years the leftist ideology, just as in the UK, to flood the country with illiterate immigrants from mainly muslim country's, after al it's the left's new electorate. Changing our city's beyond belief. Intolerance against gay's and non-muslim women is endemic in Holland now. Are hate mongering imams prosecuted by the 'anti-racism' industry? No! Their critics are! The world upside down. The left plundered the working taxpayer and subsidised the lazy and inactive, for decades. Enough is enough. Holland now shows Europe the new way, a bright new future without looney lefties and islamophiles!''<br />
'''John en Willeke wrote: Oct 8th 2010 1:30 GMT'''
+
'''boris the dutchman, The Economist, Oct 8th 2010 1:17 GMT'''
  
''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.'' <br />
+
''Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.''<br />
 
'''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''
 
'''JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT '''
  
 
+
''"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."''<br />
[[Categorie:Linkse kranten]]
+
''Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.''<br />
 +
'''GeertAkbar wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:17 GMT'''

Huidige versie van 8 jul 2017 om 13:04

Linkse Engelstalige, door de PvdA geïnfecteerde krantje dat niemand leest. Noemt onze Geert een valse profeet en een racist. Ook wordt onze leider er met een (neo-)nazi vergeleken. Walgelijk!




So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?
Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS BALDLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.
Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it. The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>
DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT

More and more Dutch are fed up with the looney left and its political-correct censorist police. It was for years the leftist ideology, just as in the UK, to flood the country with illiterate immigrants from mainly muslim country's, after al it's the left's new electorate. Changing our city's beyond belief. Intolerance against gay's and non-muslim women is endemic in Holland now. Are hate mongering imams prosecuted by the 'anti-racism' industry? No! Their critics are! The world upside down. The left plundered the working taxpayer and subsidised the lazy and inactive, for decades. Enough is enough. Holland now shows Europe the new way, a bright new future without looney lefties and islamophiles!
boris the dutchman, The Economist, Oct 8th 2010 1:17 GMT

Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.
JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT

"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."
Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.
GeertAkbar wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:17 GMT