The Economist: verschil tussen versies

Versie van 8 okt 2010 om 15:24

Linkse, Engelstalige, Linkse graaier, door de PvdA geinfecteerde krant. Vind Geert maar een valse profeet en een racist. Ook wordt onze blonde leider er met de (neo-)Nazis vergeleken. Wij, Henk en Ingrid vinden dit natuurlijk niet goed.

The Economist pearls;

"Maybe the state should not be in the business of prosecuting politicians for their offensive views."

Maybe? Has the Economist sunk so low that it isn't even sure about whether prosecuting people for their political views is appropriate? China, North-Korea and Iran - all of which prosecute people for their "offensive" views - are ecstatic. Freedom of speech for the Economist, but not for Wilders, apparently. Disgusting.
GeertAkbar wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:17 GMT

So The Economist thinks attacking Islam and The Koran is dangerous stupidity?

Utter rubbish!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS BADLY NEEDED. Thank God someone has had the guts to do it at last.

Marx said that the criticism of religion is the basis of ALL criticism. There can be no freedom without it.

The Economist dishonestly says American conservatives sympathise with Wilders. Only? I AM AN INDIAN LEFTIST, and I SYMPATHISE WITH WILDERS>
DAULATRAM wrote: Oct 8th 2010 11:49 GMT

This side is top!
John en Willeke wrote: Oct 8th 2010 1:30 GMT

Hmmm.. it seems the PvdA (the Dutch socialists) have infiltrated the Economist. Disregarding the growing public support for this coalition, stereotyping non-city dwellers, factual inconsistencies (no focus on infrastructure???), quoting a far-left economist; Come on, Economist, this is all a bit to easy.
JayJayV wrote: Oct 7th 2010 4:29 GMT